Tag Archives: environment

Satire and environmentalism

Something a bit lighter but still of interest. A friend this morning was telling me about a recent piece on the satirical news website The Onion about Chevron proposing solar-powered oil drilling platforms. The Onion has also run more than one piece on the Pope, of which the funniest in my opinion is one in which he rejects his criticism of capitalism when he sees the wide variety of Oreos on sale.

These I think tell us something helpful about the US mindset – for comedy of this sort to work,the audience needs to have an appreciation of the issues being referred to. Or else it just goes straight over their head. So we can assume that many in the US understand the importance of reducing carbon emissions (or at least that others think so) and the hypocrisy of the oil companies. And, indeed, that the Pope feels there is a problem with capitalism – although it’s unclear whether its a more nuanced opinion than “the Pope thinks capitalism is bad”.


Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Communicating Hope conference

Last week I shared a couple of days with about sixty people as we looked at the issue of how to find hope in our current environmental situation and how to communicate it more widely. It was organised by Ruth Valerio of A Rocha and Margot Hodson of JRI, with the main speakers were Martin Hodson, Richard Bauckham and Andy Atkins.

It’s taken me a while to process my thoughts. I think this is a good sign as it has forced me to reconsider both what we as a group of thinkers, activists and communicators should be doing, and me personally. (I haven’t seen much other comment on the conference online, so maybe other people are doing the same!)

This can only really be a personal overview and I’m only going to give brief outlines of the talks. I think Richard Bauckham’s talk is going to be published online, and it’s one where you’re better off reading the source than a second-hand description! And although the talks were important, the heart of the event was getting together and wrestling through the various issues, and giving us a safe space to express our own emotions.

These were particularly to the fore at the end of the first evening, after Martin Hodson’s “problems” talk presenting the latest updates to our environmental state. It need not be said that these were predominantly gloomy, with only a couple of potential green shoots. We then got into small groups to come up with our own ideas of what the problems were. Our group’s 14 post-it notes was not atypical.

The two morning talks gave some pointers to how we might go forward. Richard Bauckham encouraged us to rediscover the true nature of the Christian hopes. We’ve too often seen there just being one: our ultimate hope in eternal life with God in a fully restored creation, which has led to one of two opposite faults. Either we do too little to look after this one, or make an attempt to progress towards utopia on Earth (in line with post-Enlightenment thinking) and get frustrated when it doesn’t happen.

Instead we should see hope as rooted in a combination of love and faith, maturity and realism, seeing positive outcomes we can aim for which are feasible from where we are now. It may or may not be too late to avert major climate catastrophe, but we can at least do the best we can to mitigate from making it worse, to adapt as best we can, and help people imagine a possible future which is better than the one we fear.

Andy Atkins gave us the benefits of his practical experience as a campaigner. Again I can’t really do justice to his talk, but the main points I took away personally were the need to be wise in how we use what we have in the light of rapidly changing situations, and to ally with each other to use our respective strengths.

Interspersed through this were more time for group discussion, an Open Space discussion on various themes – our group looked at how we get a sustainability message out beyond our small community in the church – prayer and worship.

So what did I take away?

Perhaps greatest was a new sense of purpose and hope. It is so easy to get jaded, depressed and a sense that nobody else cares for what you do, but although the practical situation seems increasingly dire, there is still hope, plenty to do, and other supportive people there doing it too. In the week since the conference I’ve felt new passion for what I’m doing, and a few new positive ways to go forward.

It was certainly an encouragement to hear that our Sustainability in Crisis conference and this blog had been helpful to various people in their thinking and contacts.

I think the most urgent task, for me at least, is to get the message out to as many in the Christian community as possible, and now have a possible pathway for that to happen via a new contact in a significant place.

There was also a reminder that things are interconnected to a greater degree than we often see. I’ve been rethinking what I understand by stewardship/dominion in Genesis 1, which will be the subject of a future post, but if I’m right it could be helpful in unsticking some of the places the debate has got stuck.

But perhaps most is a reminder that we’re not doing this on our own: there is a community out there with the same concerns, and it helps to reconnect with them, reflect, and recharge periodically. The conference was much more than that, but had it been just that it would still have been worthwhile.


Filed under Meetings

Treehugger site runs religion and sustainability series

(Colin Bell)

Treehugger.com, one of the leading websites for environment, sustainability and related material, is running a series called Green Spirit in which Matthew McDermott looks at the environmental views of various of the major world religions and how they’re putting them into practice. So far we’ve had an introduction,Hinduism and Christianity, with Judaism, Buddhism, Islam and some sort of paganism to come, I assume from the artwork.

They’re helpful short introductions to what is believed and well worth reading. Perhaps more usefully they counter widely held views (in the USA certainly) about some religious groups – Christians especially – having no interest in looking after the material world. And they propose religious groups as important in the debate and potential allies which is very helpful to hear from the mainstream secular side of the movement.

Here’s why, from Matt’s introduction:

… we–and I’m speaking now about the environmental community more widely not just my own little corner of it here on TreeHugger–need to recognize the value of religion in creating a more ecologically and socially just future. Before we even get to discussing different spiritual paths’ take on the environment, as a practical matter religion is at the center of hundreds of millions of people’s lives in one way or another.

It is foolish to not tap into this in a public way, encouraging and emphasizing the fact that there is not a major (or minor) faith tradition on the planet that does not speak positively on environmental preservation.

Granted, these values are differently emphasized, differently expressed (and certainly differently applied) in various communities and at different times, but at the core there is not a single path that explicitly endorses pollution, endorses ecological destruction, endorses environmental degradation. Furthermore, as awareness about humans’ environmental impact grows more and more religious groups are actively emphasizing ecological protection and acting on these beliefs in practical ways.

This overlap in mission, belief, and action is too important to ignore. In continuing to sideline the power of faith communities in mobilizing people for environmental protection, the green movement overlooks a potentially huge ally.

1 Comment

Filed under Links